Comments on: Content is NOT important http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important spam 2.0 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:16:51 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: busin3ss http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-63398 busin3ss Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:22 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-63398 It means that I'm wrong :D It means that I’m wrong :D

]]> By: Court http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-63359 Court Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:51:02 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-63359 What does it mean when the formula total and yahoo site explorer are not even close? ex yahoo se shows 137 incoming links all domains formula shows 2650 links needed website was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadbury_Dairy_Milk search term was dairy milk lol What does it mean when the formula total and yahoo site explorer are not even close?

ex
yahoo se shows 137 incoming links all domains

formula shows 2650 links needed

website was
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadbury_Dairy_Milk

search term was
dairy milk

lol

]]> By: Felix http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-61692 Felix Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:43:13 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-61692 That's very true, thanks for the post. BL is still the factor in getting visitors not content(rarely it does) Great blog by the way, bookmarked it :) That’s very true, thanks for the post.

BL is still the factor in getting visitors not content(rarely it does)

Great blog by the way, bookmarked it :)

]]> By: SEOnatic – SEO, SEM, Conversion, Adwords, Analytics » Archiv » Google Algorythmus geknackt http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-60845 SEOnatic – SEO, SEM, Conversion, Adwords, Analytics » Archiv » Google Algorythmus geknackt Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:15:50 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-60845 [...] kleines Schmankerl liefert der Autor des Blogs dann noch seine Version des Google-Algorythmus – das Rätselraten scheint [...] [...] kleines Schmankerl liefert der Autor des Blogs dann noch seine Version des Google-Algorythmus – das Rätselraten scheint [...]

]]> By: Black Hattitude http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-60271 Black Hattitude Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:04:20 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-60271 Hum ... I would have put the title : Content is FAR LESS important than BL. Of course you can put a page to a good position in SERP without the keyword in your page, but having it helps a LOT. Having a good onpage optimization must really be a plus. A simple test to do : just create two pages with and without a good onpage optimization on 2 different domains, create the same BL, and see who is going first on Google! Hum … I would have put the title :

Content is FAR LESS important than BL.

Of course you can put a page to a good position in SERP without the keyword in your page, but having it helps a LOT. Having a good onpage optimization must really be a plus.

A simple test to do : just create two pages with and without a good onpage optimization on 2 different domains, create the same BL, and see who is going first on Google!

]]> By: nawed http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-60235 nawed Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:26:49 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-60235 [quote comment=""][...] andrealpar:… Content is not important … –LINK– [...][/quote] So Is it safe to use blackhat method of xrumer to inrease backlinks? how google can check if anyone is using xrumer to increase the number of backlinks

[...] andrealpar:… Content is not important … –LINK– [...]

So Is it safe to use blackhat method of xrumer to inrease backlinks? how google can check if anyone is using xrumer to increase the number of backlinks

]]> By: Freitag, 28.08.09 – SEO Tweets | abtwittern http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-60021 Freitag, 28.08.09 – SEO Tweets | abtwittern Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:59:08 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-60021 [...] andrealpar:… Content is not important … –LINK– [...] [...] andrealpar:… Content is not important … –LINK– [...]

]]> By: busin3ss http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-59994 busin3ss Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:44:15 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-59994 Hehehe... You are right about that one. Hehehe… You are right about that one.

]]> By: Chris http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-59992 Chris Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:41:10 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-59992 It does however prove that the rankings are flawed."The worst band in the world" doesn't have nickelback.com at #1 It does however prove that the rankings are flawed.”The worst band in the world” doesn’t have nickelback.com at #1

]]> By: Mark http://blackhatseo-blog.com/content-is-not-important/comment-page-1#comment-59989 Mark Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:23:23 +0000 http://blackhatseo-blog.com/?p=162#comment-59989 I did hear that Google stores its ranking algorithms on the back of postage stamps. I did hear that Google stores its ranking algorithms on the back of postage stamps.

]]>